I've had a comment regarding my second to last post stating the report I quoted was wrong and directing me to this forum for further details.
So the report said the councillor has been accused of heterosexism, unintentional bias against those who are not hetrosexual, by the LGBT group. That is what I stated in my post.
The forum shows a letter... which shows the LGBT group said he had been unintentional biased against others.
The only difference I can see is that they have a problem with the word "accused". Instead they say they pointed to him as an example of unintentional bias; i.e. they weren't accusing him, they were stating that it was a FACT that he was biased.
OK... this is just silly. Homosexuals have families too. I think this is a clear case of the LGBT group being biased against families, those who wish to own a 4 bedroom house so they can hold orgies and the general public. I think they need to go on a course regarding tolerance. Can't have people being biased against other people that might lead to a free society.
As a libertarian I have a problem with 1) partisan councils dictating housing policy, 2) people who believe that just because someone elses views are different to their own they must be wrong and 3) that people don't have the right to be utter bastards. They do, and the best way to sort them out is to stand a nice person against them in a free election and see who wins. Not to try to silence their views because they conflict with our own.
Technorati Tags: Gay
Comment deleted by poster.
ReplyDeleteWow, I deleted that one just in time...I was ranting on about how special interest groups in university towns have way too much time on their hands.